A trial between Hollywood actors starts this year in the USA Johnny depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard… Each of them wants to sue the ex-spouse for tens of millions of dollars.
Earlier, Johnny Depp’s lawyers caught Amber Heard of perjury in Royal Court of London (she did not donate to charity the promised several million dollars received in the course of the divorce). However, they were unable to obtain an appeal against the newspaper. The sunalthough the competence of the judge Andrew Nicolas and raised questions.
The main legal battle will unfold in the Virginia state court. Thus, Heard’s lawyers demanded that the Los Angeles police provide recordings from breast cameras worn by two patrol officers while on duty, as well as documents and messages about emergency calls and incidents related to Heard.
The actress believes that Depp did not provide all the necessary materials and answers in the case. Prior to this, the actor’s representatives accused his ex-wife of abuse and violation of court rules, as well as attempts to mislead the participants in the process with the help of false statements.
This week’s edition Daily mail published videos from police officers’ chest cameras, which were made back in 2016. It was then that a fight allegedly took place that ended the marriage of the actors.
Amber Heard and her friends claimed that during a quarrel, Johnny Depp threw a phone in her face, and also smashed the kitchen, staging a carnage. White and red wine from broken bottles allegedly flooded the carpets and walls; shards of glasses and candelabra were scattered everywhere.
But if you look at the videos, you can make a preliminary conclusion that the actress was lying. In May 2016, the Los Angeles mansion was visited by two groups of police officers who carefully examined the building.
Two law enforcement officers from the first group stated that they did not find any traces of pogrom or vandalism. On Heard, the consequences of the beatings were also not visible, and no one found puddles of spilled alcohol in the rooms.
On the videos from the chest cameras of the second group of police officers, no obvious signs of damage can also be seen, but whole candelabra, an unharmed bottle of alcohol and several dogs running on the floor are visible.
Depp’s representatives believe that the videos lead to the conclusion that the testimony of Hurd and her associates was “a grandiose lie”, so the actress cannot be trusted. Note that the court provides for liability for perjury.
See also: Deadline: Amber Heard requires Disney to hand over all the dirt on Johnny Depp
Greedy “benefactor”: Johnny Depp caught Amber Heard lying
Small Screen: Amber Heard’s Scenes Cuts From Aquaman 2, Actress Is In A “Perilous Position”